are living hand to mouth; fearing ICE-enhanced racial profiling or the regular old version of race-based criminalization; battling home foreclosure; navigating higher ed debt; and regrouping after political debacles.” —Akiba Solomon in COLORLINES
http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/12/gender_2012_more_battles_for_reproductive_healthcare.html
In Florida and Montana anti-abortion initiatives or referenda will appear on state ballots in 2012. In nine additional states, initiatives or referenda to restrict women’s reproductive rights may appear on the 2012 November ballot.
Initiatives and Referenda that Will Appear on State Ballots
Montana-A parental notification initiative, requiring that the parents of a minor be notified prior to an abortion, will appear on the ballot in 2012 as a legislatively-referred state statute. In California, an initiative that requires parental notification before a minor obtains an abortion may also appear on the ballot. Ten different versions of the initiative have been filed with the Attorney General. Three prior parental notification ballot measures have been defeated- in 2005, 2006, and 2008. Four versions are currently circulating.
Florida- A state constitutional amendment prohibiting the use of public funds for abortion, except as required by federal law and to save the mother’s life will appear on the state ballot. Moreover, the measure includes a provision that the Florida constitution cannot be interpreted as providing broader rights for abortion than the US Constitution. The amendment requires 60 percent voter approval to be adopted.
Although no “personhood” state constitutional amendment has been approved to appear on a 2012 state ballot, such amendments are currently circulating in eight states. Anti-abortion rights groups are divided about proceeding with the personhood amendments because of the recent defeat of a personhood amendment in Mississippi and because they question whether the initiatives and referenda will be upheld in the courts. For example the National Right to Life Committee and Phyllis Schlafly’s Eagle Forum appear to be opposed to this effort.
Alabama- A personhood amendment, which provides state constitutional rights to fertilized eggs, may appear on the 2012 state ballot as a legislatively-referred state statute. A three-fifths vote of the state legislature is required.
Arkansas-A personhood amendment, which proposed to give constitutional rights from the moment of fertilization, may appear on the state ballot. On January 3, 2012 state Attorney General Dustin McDaniel rejected the wording of the amendment, citing ambiguity. Personhood Arkansas, which introduced the amendment, can resubmit its proposal. 78,133 signatures must be gathered in order for the amendment to appear on the ballot.
California - A personhood amendment, which states that personhood begins at the moment of conception, may appear on the state ballot. 807,615 signatures must be collected by April 16, 2012. Colorado- The language of a personhood amendment, which states that personhood begins at the start of biological development, has been approved. 85,853 signatures are needed by August 6, 2012.
Florida- A personhood amendment, which proposes to give constitutional rights from the beginning of biological development, may appear on the ballot. Personhood Florida and the American Life League support adding a personhood amendment to the state ballot. However, Eagle Forum is opposed because it diverts attention from electing anti-abortion candidates. Moreover, Florida’s Catholic Bishops recently banned the collection of any signatures at churches for the initiative. As of November 2011, only 200,000 signatures had been collected, and 676,811 are needed for the amendment to appear on the state ballot.
Georgia- A personhood amendment may appear on the Georgia ballot as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment. The amendment states that life begins at the moment of fertilization, and it would ban abortion and in vitro fertilization. It must be approved by a two-thirds vote of the state House and Senate.
Montana- A personhood amendment, which would give constitutional rights to a “person” at any stage of development including at fertilization and conception, may appear on the state ballot. 48,673 signatures must be collected by June 22, 2012. Five hundred churches have indicated their support for the personhood amendment. 116,283 signatures must be collected before July 6, 2012.
Ohio- The Ohio Ballot Board approved the language purposed by anti-abortion rights groups for a personhood amendment, which proposes to give constitutional rights to a fertilized egg. The petitioners must now collect 385,245 signatures from 44 of Ohio’s 88 counties in the next six months in order for the initiative to appear on the state’s November ballot.
What’s more, two states may have “Right to Life” amendments on their ballots.
Kansas- A legislatively-referred “Right to Life” Amendment that would end abortion in the state may appear on the state ballot. It requires a two-thirds vote of both the Kansas House and Senate.
Oregon- The “Right to Life” amendment, which “recognizes right to life of human beings-unless sentenced to death-and embryos” and would prohibit abortions, may appear on the state ballot.
The Food and Drug Administration approved over-the-counter sale of the morning-after pill for all women in December. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, went over their heads to block over-the-counter access for teens under 17.
President Obama defended her decision “as the father of two daughters,” saying: “Sebelius decided 10- and 11-year-olds should not be able to buy the drug alongside bubble gum or batteries.”
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/12/Obama-No-involvement-in-Plan-B-decision-581152/1
I find this framing and rhetoric really troubling. Both Sebelius and Obama urge us to appeal to “common sense.” But their “common sense” seems completely out of touch with real teenage life. They seem to have no concept of the type of barriers young women face.
Or maybe they do and are simply throwing teenagers under the bus because they can’t vote.
His “Let Women Die” bill (H.R.358) gives hospitals the right to refuse to provide a woman with emergency, lifesaving abortion care – even if she will die without it.
(Source: naral.org)
Why they’re watching:
This past year, we have been witnessing the most aggressive legislative attacks on women’s health and rights in a generation.The 2010 elections dramatically changed the U.S. Congress and state legislatures nationwide, leading to a wave of efforts to restrict access to lifesaving health care, including breast exams, cancer screenings, and birth control. Instead of focusing on jobs and the economy, anti-women’s health leaders in Congress and the states have been spending their time introducing and passing bills restricting women’s access to health care. In fact, lawmakers have introduced more than 1,000 reproductive health bills in legislatures across the country, the majority of which seek to undermine women’s health.
(Source: plannedparenthoodaction.org)
Kathleen Sebelius’s office—(202) 690–7000; Kathleen.Sebelius@hhs.gov
Kathleen Sebelius is the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. She’s the federal goverment’s top health official.
White House comment line—(202) 456-1111
John Boehner’s office—(202) 225-6205
John Boehner is the Speaker of the House.
In 2012 we will have to have to fight for specific, basic freedoms. Check the dashboard for direct ways to take action.
